
Um... well, were to start. Surprisingly I'd have to agree with the critics when they say that Huxley was ahead of his time, in that he would appeal more to this period in time with his twisted, sexual, and futuristic plot. If you can't tell, I did not like this book. Actually I'm puzzled why this would be on any high school suggested reading list? Like many of his time he focused on the worst in society and government and took it to the extreme creating a society that the government controls through sex and drugs... and this makes him special how?
What is his purpose for writing it? To warn people of what is going to happen. If he wanted to do that he should have written an essay or had another author help him, because his writing stinks, period. First major problem, the doom and gloom ending, one of my writing rule of thumbs is that even if you want to make a point nobody is going to want to read your book or recommend it if it doesn't have even a little hope at the end like The Giver. Problem two, a main character fake out. Never focus on one character till the middle of the book and then do a switch-a-roo to the real MC it makes the first half seem like a waist of time, I'm guessing that his reason for that was to introduce the reader to this "brave new world" but he could easily have done that through the MC's point of view ( what I'm trying to get at is that he has no valid reason for his poor writing except that he is a poor author).
This book has only done one thing for me and that is to confuse me. I can't figure out how this book is considered literarily meritorious and even sometimes a classic? Can you say lame.


